Seems like I'm contributing to another newspaper and I didn't even know it! Well seems like the newspaper didn't know that either! This morning I got an e-mail from Nanos asking me to change the name of one of my files (on google docs) cause... The Standard thought it was a document from Nanos, providing polls in every riding!
I mean, seriously, how can a journalist really thinks Nanos hosts its (crappy) pdf on Google docs? With no methodology, no details? And how can they believe Nanos could poll every riding?
As I've said, funny thing. Seems a couple of Conservatives got excited for nothing as these projections were using a single Nanos poll puttng the Tories way higher than the average in Ontario.
